Transferring a Buy-to-Let into a Limited Company: SPV Mortgage Case Study

Megan Davis Megan Davis
April 23rd, 2026

Loan Amount

£225,000

LTV

75%

Background

This case involved a landlord who owned a three-bedroom buy-to-let (BTL) property in their personal name. Following advice from their accountant, they decided to transfer the property into a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) limited company to benefit from a more tax-efficient ownership structure.

The strategy is increasingly popular among landlords looking to optimise tax and scale their buy-to-let portfolios.

Challenge

While the client had been advised that transferring the property into a limited company was straightforward, the reality from a lending perspective was more complex.

Key challenges included:

  • The lender treating the transaction as a full purchase by the SPV, not a simple transfer

  • Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) being payable based on the market value

  • A general lack of awareness around these costs among landlords

  • The need to raise sufficient funds to cover both the mortgage and associated transaction costs

This is a common misconception in the buy-to-let market, where tax advice and lending criteria do not always align.

Solution

We structured a limited company buy-to-let mortgage to facilitate the transaction efficiently.

Key elements included:

  • Raising a £225,000 mortgage in the SPV name

  • Allocating £38,000 towards stamp duty and legal costs

  • Ensuring the lender was comfortable with the structure, treating it as a market-value purchase

  • Aligning the deal with the client’s long-term portfolio and tax strategy

By clearly positioning the transaction as a purchase rather than a transfer, we were able to meet lender requirements and avoid delays.

Outcome

The client successfully transferred the property into their SPV limited company, achieving their goal of a more tax-efficient structure.

As a result:

  • The buy-to-let property is now held within a corporate structure

  • All stamp duty and transaction costs were covered within the funding

  • The client is better positioned for future portfolio growth and tax planning

This case highlights a key consideration for landlords: while transferring a buy-to-let into a limited company can offer tax advantages, lenders will always assess it as a full purchase at market value, meaning stamp duty is typically unavoidable.

Megan Davis
Megan Davis

Share This